Erik, After some more experiments, I can get it to perform incorrectly using the sample solr data.
The example query from SOLR-792 ticket: http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=0&facet=on&facet.field=cat&facet.tree=cat,inStock&wt=json&indent=on Make a few altertions to the query: 1) swap the tree order - all tree facets are 0 http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=0&facet=on&facet.field=cat&facet.tree=inStock,cat&wt=json&indent=on 2) swap tree order and change facet.field to be the primary( inStock ) http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=0&facet=on&facet.field=inStock&facet.tree=inStock,cat&wt=json&indent=on Also, can tree faceting work distributed? enjoy, -jeremy On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:41:21PM -0700, Erik Hatcher wrote: > Jeremy, > > What's the full request you're making to Solr? > > Do you get values when you facet normally on date_id and type? > &facet.field=date_id&facet.field=type > > Erik > > p.s. this e-mail is not on the list (on a hotel net connection blocking > outgoing mail) - feel free to reply to this back on the list though. > > On Oct 15, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Jeremy Hinegardner wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm testing out using the Tree Faceting Component (SOLR-792) on top of >> Solr 1.3. >> >> It looks like it would do exactly what I want, but something is not >> working >> correctly with my schema. When I use the example schema, it works just >> fine, >> but I swap out the example schema's and example index and then put in my >> index >> and and schema, tree facet does not work. >> >> Both of the fields I want to facet can be faceted individually, but when I >> say >> facet.tree=date_id,type then all of the values are 0. >> >> Does anyone have any ideas on where I should start looking ? >> >> enjoy, >> >> -jeremy >> >> -- >> ======================================================================== >> Jeremy Hinegardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- ======================================================================== Jeremy Hinegardner [EMAIL PROTECTED]