Jeremy,
Great troubleshooting! You were spot on.
I've posted a new patch that fixes the issue.
Erik
On Oct 16, 2008, at 9:53 PM, Jeremy Hinegardner wrote:
After a bit more investigating, it appears that any facet tree where
the first
item is numerical or boolean or some non-textual type does not
produce any
secondary facets. This includes sint, sfloat, boolean and such.
For instance, on the sample index:
facet.tree=sku,cat => works
facet.tree=cat,sku => works
facet.tree=manu_exact,cat => works
facet.tree=cat,manu_exact => works
facet.tree=popularity,inStock => fails
facet.tree=inStock,popularity => fails
facet.tree=manu_exact,weight => works
facet.tree=weight,manu_exact => fails
I'm not very familiar with the Solr / Lucene Java API, so this is
slow going
here. Maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree, but is the TermQuery for
the
secondary SimpleFacet messing up some how? I tried to dig into the
code, but
was unsuccessful.
It appears to me that the searcher never returns a docSet for any
TermQuery
where the field being searched has a type that is non-textual.
As a final test, I changed the schema and made the inStock field a
'text' field
instead of 'boolean'. When I did that, and reindexed the sample
data then the
tree facet would work correctly as either facet.tree=cat,inStock or
facet.tree=inStock,cat. Whereas before it would only work in the
former.
enjoy,
-jeremy
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:55:49AM -0600, Jeremy Hinegardner wrote:
Erik,
After some more experiments, I can get it to perform incorrectly
using the
sample solr data.
The example query from SOLR-792 ticket:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=0&facet=on&facet.field=cat&facet.tree=cat,inStock&wt=json&indent=on
Make a few altertions to the query:
1) swap the tree order - all tree facets are 0
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=0&facet=on&facet.field=cat&facet.tree=inStock,cat&wt=json&indent=on
2) swap tree order and change facet.field to be the
primary( inStock )
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=0&facet=on&facet.field=inStock&facet.tree=inStock,cat&wt=json&indent=on
Also, can tree faceting work distributed?
enjoy,
-jeremy
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:41:21PM -0700, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Jeremy,
What's the full request you're making to Solr?
Do you get values when you facet normally on date_id and type?
&facet.field=date_id&facet.field=type
Erik
p.s. this e-mail is not on the list (on a hotel net connection
blocking
outgoing mail) - feel free to reply to this back on the list though.
On Oct 15, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Jeremy Hinegardner wrote:
Hi all,
I'm testing out using the Tree Faceting Component (SOLR-792) on
top of
Solr 1.3.
It looks like it would do exactly what I want, but something is not
working
correctly with my schema. When I use the example schema, it
works just
fine,
but I swap out the example schema's and example index and then
put in my
index
and and schema, tree facet does not work.
Both of the fields I want to facet can be faceted individually,
but when I
say
facet.tree=date_id,type then all of the values are 0.
Does anyone have any ideas on where I should start looking ?
enjoy,
-jeremy
--
=
=
=
=
=
===================================================================
Jeremy Hinegardner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
=
=
=
=====================================================================
Jeremy Hinegardner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
=
=
======================================================================
Jeremy Hinegardner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
