After a bit more investigating, it appears that any facet tree where the first item is numerical or boolean or some non-textual type does not produce any secondary facets. This includes sint, sfloat, boolean and such.
For instance, on the sample index: facet.tree=sku,cat => works facet.tree=cat,sku => works facet.tree=manu_exact,cat => works facet.tree=cat,manu_exact => works facet.tree=popularity,inStock => fails facet.tree=inStock,popularity => fails facet.tree=manu_exact,weight => works facet.tree=weight,manu_exact => fails I'm not very familiar with the Solr / Lucene Java API, so this is slow going here. Maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree, but is the TermQuery for the secondary SimpleFacet messing up some how? I tried to dig into the code, but was unsuccessful. It appears to me that the searcher never returns a docSet for any TermQuery where the field being searched has a type that is non-textual. As a final test, I changed the schema and made the inStock field a 'text' field instead of 'boolean'. When I did that, and reindexed the sample data then the tree facet would work correctly as either facet.tree=cat,inStock or facet.tree=inStock,cat. Whereas before it would only work in the former. enjoy, -jeremy On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:55:49AM -0600, Jeremy Hinegardner wrote: > Erik, > > After some more experiments, I can get it to perform incorrectly using the > sample solr data. > > The example query from SOLR-792 ticket: > > http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=0&facet=on&facet.field=cat&facet.tree=cat,inStock&wt=json&indent=on > > Make a few altertions to the query: > > 1) swap the tree order - all tree facets are 0 > > http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=0&facet=on&facet.field=cat&facet.tree=inStock,cat&wt=json&indent=on > > 2) swap tree order and change facet.field to be the primary( inStock ) > > http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=0&facet=on&facet.field=inStock&facet.tree=inStock,cat&wt=json&indent=on > > Also, can tree faceting work distributed? > > enjoy, > > -jeremy > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:41:21PM -0700, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > Jeremy, > > > > What's the full request you're making to Solr? > > > > Do you get values when you facet normally on date_id and type? > > &facet.field=date_id&facet.field=type > > > > Erik > > > > p.s. this e-mail is not on the list (on a hotel net connection blocking > > outgoing mail) - feel free to reply to this back on the list though. > > > > On Oct 15, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Jeremy Hinegardner wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'm testing out using the Tree Faceting Component (SOLR-792) on top of > >> Solr 1.3. > >> > >> It looks like it would do exactly what I want, but something is not > >> working > >> correctly with my schema. When I use the example schema, it works just > >> fine, > >> but I swap out the example schema's and example index and then put in my > >> index > >> and and schema, tree facet does not work. > >> > >> Both of the fields I want to facet can be faceted individually, but when I > >> say > >> facet.tree=date_id,type then all of the values are 0. > >> > >> Does anyone have any ideas on where I should start looking ? > >> > >> enjoy, > >> > >> -jeremy > >> > >> -- > >> ======================================================================== > >> Jeremy Hinegardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > ======================================================================== > Jeremy Hinegardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- ======================================================================== Jeremy Hinegardner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
