> If you are someone who wishes the PDF would continue, please share your > feedback.
I have not particularly explored the documentation format but the content. However here my thought on this: Pdf version of solr documentation has two advantages: 1. readable offline 2. make searching easier than the html version If there were a "one page" version of the html documentation, this would mitigate searching within the whole. Also a monolitic html page makes things easier to access offline.(transform back to pdf, ebook..?) I am not very happy with the search engine embedded within the html documentation I admit. Hope this is not solr under the hood :S -- nicolas
