Interesting. Do you have a reference (e.g. a patch, post, ...) to people actually doing this? The FieldCache seems like cheating because it's in-memory and there is a limited amount of memory, so for large data sets I have to wonder.
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote: > > > On Mar 23, 2010, at 4:17 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > >> On 2010-03-23 06:25, David Smiley @MITRE.org wrote: >>> >>> I use Endeca and Solr. >>> >>> A few notable things in Endeca but not in Solr: >>> 1. Real-time search. >> >> >>> 2. "related record navigation" (RRN) is what they call it. This is the >>> ability to join in other records, something Lucene/Solr definitely can't >>> do. >> >> Could you perhaps elaborate a bit on this functionality? Your description >> sounds intriguing - it reminds me of ParallelReader, but I'm probably >> completely wrong ... >> > > AIUI, it just allows you to do joins like in a db. So, given a music > band, get related things like band members, albums, etc. You can do this > in Lucene with some work by leveraging Field Cache, but it gets tricky in > light of freq. updates. > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Features-not-present-in-Solr-tp27966315p28006723.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
