Two more jaxrs solutions: http://www.jboss.org/resteasy
http://cxf.apache.org/docs/jax-rs.html However, I am not suggesting changing the core implementation. Just want to make it more powerful by utilizing headers. I can accept the other issues that have been mentioned as not RESTful. Also, I do plan to make patches for the issues I mentioned. I just wanted to know if I was missing anything or someone else already had contributed an extension. Jason -----Original Message----- From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:ryan...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:07 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: REST calls If there is a real desire/need to make things "restful" in the official sense, it is worth looking at using a REST framework as the controller rather then the current solution. perhaps: http://www.restlet.org/ https://jersey.dev.java.net/ These would be cool since they encapsulate lots of the request plumbing work that it would be better if we could leverage more widely used approaches then support our own. That said, what we have is functional and powerful -- if you are concerned about people editing the index (with GET/POST or whatever) there are plenty of ways to solve this. ryan On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Lance Norskog <goks...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've looked at the problem. It's fairly involved. It probably would > take several iterations. (But not as many as field collapsing :) > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Yonik Seeley > <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Lance Norskog <goks...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Apparently this is not ReStFuL It is IMVHO insane. >> >> Patches welcome... >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> > > > > -- > Lance Norskog > goks...@gmail.com >
