Hi, that there's no feedback indicates that our plans/preferences are fine. Otherwise it's now a good opportunity to feed back :-)
Cheers, Martin On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Martin Grotzke <martin.grot...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > we're just planning to move from our replicated single index setup to > a replicated setup with multiple cores. > We're going to start with 2 cores, but the number of cores may > change/increase over time. > > Our replication is still based on scripts/rsync, and I'm wondering if > it's worth moving to java based replication. > AFAICS the main advantage is simplicity, as with scripts based > replication our operations team would have to maintain rsync daemons / > cron jobs for each core. > Therefore my own preference would be to drop scripts and chose the > java based replication. > > I'd just wanted to ask for experiences with the one or another in a > multicore setup. What do you say? > > Another question is regarding spellchecker replication. I know there's > #SOLR-433 "MultiCore and SpellChecker replication" [1]. Based on the > status of this feature request I'd asume that the normal procedure of > keeping the spellchecker index up2date would be running a cron job on > each node/slave that updates the spellchecker. > Is that right? > > And a final one: are there other things we should be aware of / keep > in mind when planning the migration to multiple cores? > (Ok, I'm risking to get "ask specific questions!" as an answer, but > perhaps s.o. has interesting, related stories to tell :-)) > > Thanx in advance, > cheers, > Martin > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-433 > -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
