Hi Erick, On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Frankly, this puzzles me. It *looks* like it should be OK. One warning, the > analysis page sometimes is a bit misleading, so beware of that. > > But the output of your queries make it look like the query is parsing as > you > expect, which leaves the question of whether your index contains what > you think it does. You might get a copy of Luke, which allows you to > examine > what's actually in your index instead of what you think is in there. > Sometimes > there are surprises here! > > Bingo ! Some data were not in the index. Indexing them obviously fixed the problem. > I didn't mean to re-index your whole corpus, I was thinking that you could > just index a few documents in a test index so you have something small to > look at. > > Sorry I can't spot what's happening right away. > > No worries, thanks for your support :) -- Jérôme
