Jay, Was the curly closing bracket "}" intentional? I'm using 3.4, which also supports "fq=price:[10 TO 20]". The problem is the results are not working properly.
________________________________ From: Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Yuhao <nfsvi...@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 7:45 PM Subject: Re: Range facet - Count in facet menu != Count in search results Hi, If you use trunk (4.0) version, you can say fq=price:[10 TO 20} and have the upper bound be exclusive. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com On 10. feb. 2012, at 00:58, Yuhao wrote: > I've changed the "facet.range.include" option to every possible value (lower, > upper, edge, outer, all)**. It only changes the count shown in the "Ranges" > facet menu on the left. It has no effect on the count and results shown in > search results, which ALWAYS is inclusive of both the lower AND upper bounds > (which is equivalent to "include = all"). Is this by design? I would like > to make the search results include the lower bound, but not the upper bound. > Can I do that? > > My range field is multi-valued, but I don't think that should be the problem. > > ** Actually, it doesn't like "outer" for some reason, which leaves the facet > completely empty.
