Double check your default operator for a faceted search vs. regular search. I caught this difference in my work that explained this difference.
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 07:45 -0800, Yuhao wrote: > Jay, > > Was the curly closing bracket "}" intentional? I'm using 3.4, which also > supports "fq=price:[10 TO 20]". The problem is the results are not working > properly. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Yuhao <nfsvi...@yahoo.com> > Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 7:45 PM > Subject: Re: Range facet - Count in facet menu != Count in search results > > Hi, > > If you use trunk (4.0) version, you can say fq=price:[10 TO 20} and have the > upper bound be exclusive. > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com > > On 10. feb. 2012, at 00:58, Yuhao wrote: > > > I've changed the "facet.range.include" option to every possible value > > (lower, upper, edge, outer, all)**. It only changes the count shown in the > > "Ranges" facet menu on the left. It has no effect on the count and results > > shown in search results, which ALWAYS is inclusive of both the lower AND > > upper bounds (which is equivalent to "include = all"). Is this by design? > > I would like to make the search results include the lower bound, but not > > the upper bound. Can I do that? > > > > My range field is multi-valued, but I don't think that should be the > > problem. > > > > ** Actually, it doesn't like "outer" for some reason, which leaves the > > facet completely empty.
