I'll answer for Jan "Yes". Prior to 4.0, you cannot mix inclusive and exclusive operators on a range query. see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-355. If you can't go to 4.0, you can cheat and make, say, your top value a tiny bit less than the boundary. For an int-based field [1 To 20] use [1 TO 19]. For a float field [1 TO 19.999999] or some such.
Faceting is not really related to what's in the results list in terms of counts, etc., it's just a way of counting buckets. Changing the faceting parameters will not change the displayed results, which is what it appears you're expecting.... Best Erick On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Yuhao <nfsvi...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Jay, > > Was the curly closing bracket "}" intentional? I'm using 3.4, which also > supports "fq=price:[10 TO 20]". The problem is the results are not working > properly. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Yuhao <nfsvi...@yahoo.com> > Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 7:45 PM > Subject: Re: Range facet - Count in facet menu != Count in search results > > Hi, > > If you use trunk (4.0) version, you can say fq=price:[10 TO 20} and have the > upper bound be exclusive. > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com > > On 10. feb. 2012, at 00:58, Yuhao wrote: > >> I've changed the "facet.range.include" option to every possible value >> (lower, upper, edge, outer, all)**. It only changes the count shown in the >> "Ranges" facet menu on the left. It has no effect on the count and results >> shown in search results, which ALWAYS is inclusive of both the lower AND >> upper bounds (which is equivalent to "include = all"). Is this by design? >> I would like to make the search results include the lower bound, but not the >> upper bound. Can I do that? >> >> My range field is multi-valued, but I don't think that should be the problem. >> >> ** Actually, it doesn't like "outer" for some reason, which leaves the facet >> completely empty.
