Actually it seems that xml/binary request writers only behave differently
when using array[] as the value. if I use ArrayList it also works with the
xml format (4.1 branch). Still it's annoying that the two request writers
behave differently so I guess it's worth adding the jira anyway.
The Affects version should be 4.0.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hello, Sami.
>
> It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under Solr
> 4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Luis Cappa.
>
> 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ssi...@gmail.com>
>
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Thread update:
> > >
> > > When I use a simple:
> > >
> > > *Map operation = new HashMap();*
> > >
> > >
> > > Instead of:
> > >
> > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > > List<String>>();*
> > >
> > >
> > > The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
> > >
> > > fieldName: [
> > > "[Value1, Value2]"
> > > ],
> > >
> > >
> > > However, List<String> value is received as a simple String "[Value1,
> > > Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a toString()
> > > operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update atomically a
> > > multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic update
> > > operation?
> > >
> >
> > Seems to be working fine here with HttpSolrServer / BinaryRequestWriter;
> >
> > HashMap editTags = new HashMap();
> > editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});
> > doc = new SolrInputDocument();
> > doc.addField("id", "unique");
> > doc.addField("tags_ss", editTags);
> > server.add(doc);
> > server.commit(true, true);
> > resp = server.query(q);
> >
> System.out.println(resp.getResults().get(0).getFirstValue("tags_ss"));
> >
> > prints "tag1"
> >
> > ArrayList<String> as a value works the same way as String[].
> >
> > When using xml (RequestWriter) I can see the problem that you are
> > describing, can you add a jira for that?
> >
> > --
> > Sami SIren
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > > - Luis Cappa.
> > >
> > > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting with
> > > atomic
> > > > updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to work
> > > well.
> > > > Here is the snippet:
> > > >
> > > > *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
> > > > *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > > > List<String>>();*
> > > > *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I want a
> set
> > > > operation to override field values.*
> > > > *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
> > > >
> > > > *doc: {*
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *...*
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
> > > > *],*
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *...*
> > > >
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > >
> > > > *}*
> > > >
> > > > In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and the
> > field
> > > > values is String formatted and that String is used to update the
> field,
> > > :-/
> > > >
> > > > What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with SolrJ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > - Luis Cappa
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > - Luis Cappa
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> - Luis Cappa
>
