Uhm, after setting both Response and Request Writers it worked OK with *
HttpSolrServer*. I´ve tried to find a way to set BinaryResponseParser and
BinaryRequestWriter with *CloudServer *(or even via *LbHttpSolrServer*) but
I found nothing.
Suggestions? :-/
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ssi...@gmail.com>
> Try setting Request writer to binary like this:
>
> server.setParser(new BinaryResponseParser());
> server.setRequestWriter(new BinaryRequestWriter());
>
> Or then instead of string array use ArrayList<String>() that contains your
> strings as the value for the map
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi, Sami.
> >
> > Doing some tests I´ve used the same code as you and did a quick
> execution:
> >
> >
> > *HttpSolrServer server = new HttpSolrServer("
> > http://localhost:8080/solrserver/core1<
> > http://localhost:10080/newscover_es/items_es>
> > ");*
> >
> > * *
> > * try {*
> > * *
> > * HashMap editTags = new HashMap();*
> > * editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});*
> > * doc.addField("myField", editTags);*
> > * server.add(doc);*
> > * server.commit(true, true);*
> > * *
> > * } catch (SolrServerException e) {*
> > * e.printStackTrace();*
> > * } catch (IOException e) {*
> > * e.printStackTrace();*
> > * }*
> > *
> > *
> > *
> > *
> > And the resultant doc is wrong:
> >
> > <response>
> >
> > <lst name="responseHeader">
> >
> > <int name="status">0</int>
> >
> > <int name="QTime">1</int>
> >
> > <lst name="params">
> >
> > <str name="q">*:*</str>
> >
> > </lst>
> >
> > </lst>
> >
> > <result name="response" numFound="1" start="0">
> >
> > <doc>
> >
> > <str name="i_id">50a0f1f90cf226fb5677fe13</str>
> >
> > <arr name="myField">
> >
> > *<str>[Ljava.lang.String;@7d5e90cb</str> ---> toString() from String[]
> > array.*
> >
> > </arr>
> >
> > <long name="_version_">1418710023780958208</long>
> >
> > </doc>
> >
> > </result>
> >
> > </response>
> >
> >
> >
> > So is definetely executing toString() method in both *HttpSolrServer
> *and *
> > CloudServer*. Tips:
> >
> >
> > - I´m using* Solrj 4.0.0 *artifact version in a *Maven *project.
> > - The fields to be updated are *dynamicFields*.
> > - I´m using Java jdk6.
> >
> > Alternatives:
> >
> > - I´m doing something wrong and I´m so stupid that I can´t see it, :-(
> > - The way I update fields is not the correct one.
> > - There is a general bug with atomic updates via SolrJ.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > - Luis Cappa.
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > I´ll have a look to Solr source code and try to fix the bug. If I
> succeed
> > > I´ll update JIRA issue with it, :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ssi...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >> Actually it seems that xml/binary request writers only behave
> > differently
> > >> when using array[] as the value. if I use ArrayList it also works with
> > the
> > >> xml format (4.1 branch). Still it's annoying that the two request
> > writers
> > >> behave differently so I guess it's worth adding the jira anyway.
> > >>
> > >> The Affects version should be 4.0.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <
> luisca...@gmail.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hello, Sami.
> > >> >
> > >> > It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under
> > Solr
> > >> > 4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> >
> > >> > - Luis Cappa.
> > >> >
> > >> > 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ssi...@gmail.com>
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <
> > >> luisca...@gmail.com
> > >> > > >wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Thread update:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > When I use a simple:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > *Map operation = new HashMap();*
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Instead of:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > >> > > > List<String>>();*
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > fieldName: [
> > >> > > > "[Value1, Value2]"
> > >> > > > ],
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > However, List<String> value is received as a simple String
> > >> "[Value1,
> > >> > > > Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a
> > toString()
> > >> > > > operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update
> atomically a
> > >> > > > multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic
> update
> > >> > > > operation?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Seems to be working fine here with HttpSolrServer /
> > >> BinaryRequestWriter;
> > >> > >
> > >> > > HashMap editTags = new HashMap();
> > >> > > editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});
> > >> > > doc = new SolrInputDocument();
> > >> > > doc.addField("id", "unique");
> > >> > > doc.addField("tags_ss", editTags);
> > >> > > server.add(doc);
> > >> > > server.commit(true, true);
> > >> > > resp = server.query(q);
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> System.out.println(resp.getResults().get(0).getFirstValue("tags_ss"));
> > >> > >
> > >> > > prints "tag1"
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ArrayList<String> as a value works the same way as String[].
> > >> > >
> > >> > > When using xml (RequestWriter) I can see the problem that you are
> > >> > > describing, can you add a jira for that?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Sami SIren
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Luis Cappa.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Hello everyone,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting
> > >> with
> > >> > > > atomic
> > >> > > > > updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem
> to
> > >> work
> > >> > > > well.
> > >> > > > > Here is the snippet:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
> > >> > > > > *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > >> > > > > List<String>>();*
> > >> > > > > *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I
> > want a
> > >> > set
> > >> > > > > operation to override field values.*
> > >> > > > > *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > *doc: {*
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *...*
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
> > >> > > > > *],*
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *...*
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > *}*
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and
> > the
> > >> > > field
> > >> > > > > values is String formatted and that String is used to update
> the
> > >> > field,
> > >> > > > :-/
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with
> > >> SolrJ?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Regards,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > --
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > - Luis Cappa
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Luis Cappa
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > - Luis Cappa
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > - Luis Cappa
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > - Luis Cappa
> >
>
--
- Luis Cappa
