In fact, you shouldn't need OR: id:(123 456 789)
will default to OR. Upayavira On Mon, Nov 19, 2012, at 10:45 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 11/19/2012 1:49 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Otis Gospodnetic > > <otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> How about id1 OR id2 OR id3? :) > > Thank, Otis. This was my first inclination (id:123 OR 456), but it > > didn't work when I tried. At your instigation I tried then id:123 OR > > id:456. This does work. Thanks. > > You can also use this query format: > > id:(123 OR 456 OR 789) > > This does get expanded internally by the query parser to the format that > has the field name on every clause, but it is sometimes easier to write > code that produces the above form. > > Thanks, > Shawn >
