I wanted to be explicit for the OP. Vut wouldn't that depend on mm if you are using (e)dismax?
Otis -- Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > In fact, you shouldn't need OR: > > id:(123 456 789) > > will default to OR. > > Upayavira > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012, at 10:45 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > On 11/19/2012 1:49 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Otis Gospodnetic > > > <otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> How about id1 OR id2 OR id3? :) > > > Thank, Otis. This was my first inclination (id:123 OR 456), but it > > > didn't work when I tried. At your instigation I tried then id:123 OR > > > id:456. This does work. Thanks. > > > > You can also use this query format: > > > > id:(123 OR 456 OR 789) > > > > This does get expanded internally by the query parser to the format that > > has the field name on every clause, but it is sometimes easier to write > > code that produces the above form. > > > > Thanks, > > Shawn > > >
