On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Shawn Heisey <s...@elyograg.org> wrote: > You can also use this query format: > > id:(123 OR 456 OR 789) > > This does get expanded internally by the query parser to the format that has > the field name on every clause, but it is sometimes easier to write code > that produces the above form. >
Thank you Shawn, that is much cleaner and will be easier to debug when / if things go wrong. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com
