On Jan 3, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Per Steffensen <st...@designware.dk> wrote: > >> "Why Solr is better than its competitors" list :-) > > The problem is that it's not just Solr competitors. It seems to be pretty > much everyone. If you can provide counter examples, I'd be interested to see > them, but I've found confirmation examples in projects and books left and > right. > > Trying to forge our own path here seems more confusing than helpful IMO. We > have enough issues with terminology right now - where we can go with the > industry standard, I think we should. > > - Mark P.S. I'm referring specifically to "replication factor" and not replica. While I think it's probably a similar deal, I've only researched "replication factor" specifically. - Mark
