On 12/9/2013 11:13 PM, neerajp wrote:
Hi,
Pls. find my response in-line:

That said, the obvious alternative is to use /update/extract instead of
/update – this gives you a way of handling up to one binary stream in
addition to any number of fields that can be represented as text. In that
case, you need to construct a POST request that sends the binary content as
a file stream, and the other parameters as ordinary form data (actually, it
may be possible to send some/all of the other fields as url parameters, but
that does not really simplify things).

[Neeraj]: I thought about this solution but it won't work in my solution as
there are a lot text fields and size is also very significant. I am looking
for some other suggestion



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-on-plain-text-and-binary-data-in-a-single-HTTP-POST-request-tp4105661p4105827.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Assuming that your binary fields are mime attachments to email messages, they will probably already be encoded as base 64. Why not just leave them that way in solr too? You can't do much with them other than store them right? Or do you have some kind of image processing going on? You can always decode them in your client when you pull them out.

-Mike

Reply via email to