The lgpl license is an license similar to the gpl while the gpl enforces that all variations are gpl
Also i might use soya3d for an commercial project I am planning to go with opengl but might switch to soya3d On Jan 19, 2012 4:08 PM, "Pierre-Yves David" <pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:15:17PM +0100, Samarth Agarwal wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I am here to inform you that soya3d is not getting to be used to it's full > > potential,beacuse of GPL > > I think you pin-point the very main issue of soya3d: It's licence choice. > > > it does not allow commercial products without giving users the source code > > I would suggest you move to the LGPL > > BEACAUSE: > > > > 1.If they make soya3d better they will be forced to realease it to the open > > source comunity > > > > 2. more users will use it > > > > 3.GPL is not open source > > Of course it is! There is event open source licence which are not free software > according to FSF definition of Free Software. > > You may argue with this definition of Free Software from the FSF but any code > dumped to anyone with any licence is Open-Source. > > > I would recommend the MIT license for any libraries as it is truley open > > source > > You recommend LGPL or MIT, make your mind. > > > bye! > > Samarth AGARWAL > > Ok, I suggest you to go straight to you point: > > Do you represent a entity which would like to use soya3d engine in a commercial > product? > > If so, what are this product and what kind of contribution could be expect from > you? > > Sincerely > > -- > Pierre-Yves David > > _______________________________________________ > Soya-user mailing list > Soya-user@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/soya-user
_______________________________________________ Soya-user mailing list Soya-user@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/soya-user
