http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-18 14:17 ------- just to get it into BZ: I think a "post" test type is strongly a good idea, since currently we do have a test ordering scheme already, in that tests are ordered by test type, since it's faster to do it that way. So a thoroughly flexible "any test A may be specified to run before/after test B" may result in bad performance side-effects. Making "post" rules be a specific test type, that test type is guaranteed to run after all other non-post rules, and those are the only rules that can have their order controlled, would avoid that issue. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
