> Honestly, I'd like to see the immediate problem of AWL running way > before it should and in a random order fixed, with the priority stuff > coming along later. If a patch that just handles priorities for post > tests, or seperate types in general, is acceptable, I suggest the > current version be applied and the priority stuff added on later.
I agree to some extent with your view, but as we are changing APIs in 3.0, it would be bad form to add a "post" and then want to replace it later. It would be better to pick the end-point and get it into 3.0. -- Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ and open source consulting
