Rob McEwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Still, it seems that this regular expression I mentioned could be of
> great use after some of the other "cleanup" you listed is completed.

If you want to go with a regular expression based approach, you might
want to look at some older SpamAssassin releases before we added the
HTML parser (I think that happened in 2.50).

> Also, in a greater sense, it would be nice to have a "pseudo-code" step by
> step guide for doing this. Sort of a "suggested to do list" for developers
> of all types who want to incorporate SURBL into their filtering software.

Well, that's a SURBL discussion, not a SpamAssassin one.  ;-)

Now might be a good time to point out that SpamAssassin, *especially*
the forthcoming SpamAssassin 3.0 release is an excellent platform for
filtering.  SA 3.0 has a plug-in architecture that allows additional
methods like SURBL and SPF to easily hook-in.  Figuring out stuff like
how to do MIME and HTML for adversial targets like spam is very hard and
I'm a big believer in not reinventing the wheel, so if you can, I
encourage everyone to make use of the SpamAssassin platform in this way.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/

Reply via email to