On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 9:14:34 PM, Rob McEwen wrote: > Jeff > forwarded this question to a couple of groups. One of these was the > SpamAssassin Developers group. Even though my question had nothing to do > with SpamAssassin, I think that Jeff was just thinking that someone in the > SpamAssassin Developers group might have something of interest to add
Yes, I was hoping that someone could suggest some code to use. On the SURBL discussion list, Justin Mason suggested: 'SpamAssassin 3.0.0's "mass-check --loguris" works quite well'. I forgot that you're not subscribed to the SURBL discussion list so I'll forward some of that thread to you manually. That said, Daniel's suggestion to take a look at SpamAssassin is perhaps not so far-fetched since SA provides a good spam-handling framework, including message body parsing, which can be non-trivial to develop. SA development also tracks changes in the spammer's tactics. Jeff C.
