"Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, all I can say is that I have a sucky upstream DNS-server and with 2.6x > a check often took 30-60 seconds. Without Razor and stuff.
This is most likely due to the MX test. > But this was hopefully improved with the new timout code. The timeout code is basically unchanged since 2.60. I think your problem is something else. 15 seconds is the longest possible timeout for DNSBL rules and is very unlikely due to the scaling timeout code (see the rbl_timeout documentation in Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf). Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
