-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Malte S. Stretz writes: > On Tuesday 06 July 2004 10:03 CET Daniel Quinlan wrote: > > "Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Well, all I can say is that I have a sucky upstream DNS-server and with > > > 2.6x a check often took 30-60 seconds. Without Razor and stuff. > > > > This is most likely due to the MX test. > > > > > But this was hopefully improved with the new timout code. > > > > The timeout code is basically unchanged since 2.60. I think your > > problem is something else. 15 seconds is the longest possible timeout > > for DNSBL rules and is very unlikely due to the scaling timeout code > > (see the rbl_timeout documentation in Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf). > > Wasn't the scaling timeout introduced for 3.x? > > Anyway, since I upgraded to 3.x I haven't seen any checks taking that long > anymore, so whatever it was, I take it as fixed :) there were bugs in Dns.pm, where some rules like NO_DNS_FOR_FROM did a DNS lookup without any timeout :( fixed in 3.0.0. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFA7ESqQTcbUG5Y7woRAttiAJ493x3b/m0A2kUfVad31Le+bmQ8RgCgtWbU jJqQuyMElObf8BCr92aPaKM= =xMmQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
