hi michael. maybe you're right about a pure perl implementation, but for me it seems that writing a perl extension to libspamc is way less time consuming, for example all that ssl stuff needs to be reprogrammed. anyway, most systems should have a c compiler, and looking over CPAN, this assumption is made very often :) are you interested in my work anyway, when i'm finished? (will be this days)
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Michael Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2004 16:28 > An: Johannes russek > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: libspamc > > > On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:23:01PM +0200, Johannes russek wrote: > > hello everybody. > > is libspamc currently under active development? > > Yes > > > am i the only one that is interested in having such a > functionality, or is > > even someone else doing this right now? > > I think it would be more useful to have a pure perl implementation, > rather than an XS wrapper around libspamc. Then it would be available > on systems without a C compiler. > > That said, yes, I'd like this functionality, and was looking for such > a thing the other day. I started something but have had zero time to > do anything with it. > > Michael >
