On Thursday 08 July 2004 16:28 CET Michael Parker wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:23:01PM +0200, Johannes russek wrote:
> > hello everybody.
> > is libspamc currently under active development?
>
> Yes
More specific: spamc *is* more or less libspamc or just a little caller for
it.
> > am i the only one that is interested in having such a functionality, or
> > is even someone else doing this right now?
>
> I think it would be more useful to have a pure perl implementation,
> rather than an XS wrapper around libspamc. Then it would be available
> on systems without a C compiler.
I like the idea of having a C implementation as that would be only one place
to debug code in. But thats doesn't mean thare can't be both
implementations.
Johannes, I look forward to see something like this :)
Cheers,
Malte
P.S.: Jo, could you plase configure your Outlook such that it uses English
header prefixes, not the German "AW" ones?
--
[SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
<http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>
[ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way"
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
