On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 04:37:08PM +0200, Johannes russek wrote: > hi michael. > maybe you're right about a pure perl implementation, but for me it seems > that writing a perl extension to libspamc is way less time consuming, for > example all that ssl stuff needs to be reprogrammed. > anyway, most systems should have a c compiler, and looking over CPAN, this > assumption is made very often :) > are you interested in my work anyway, when i'm finished? > (will be this days)
I see utility in having both, so feel free to send it along once you've got something working. Michael
