http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-09 16:08 ------- Subject: Re: [review]New regression test for SSL in spamc/spamd -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I would hope that editing the t/config file would be done only in > unusual circumstances. The regression tests should be a sanity check for > everything that is built. The network tests are tricky, since it makes > sense to build SpamAssassin with the ability to perform network > functions without the build environment having the ability to run them. > But I would look at it on a case by case basis, whether it is possible > to run a regression test with no user inout, or if not whether it is > less confusing to ask a question or to require editing a config file. I'm seeing the information as a kind of site-specific policy on what tests to run. Most CPAN-using users don't need to run SSL tests, or LDAP/SQL tests where explicit user setup is required; however, we as devs should be using those. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD4DBQFA7yVQQTcbUG5Y7woRAoUNAJiYeiOqjXiv8WMF22REHJA/dYCuAKDVqxWX CjYJ0amjyTzvhOJaRmnPbw== =xjl0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
