http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 12:16 ------- Subject: Re: [review]New regression test for SSL in spamc/spamd On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:04:29AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Oh, and reading over the comments, I'm not sure whether Theo has been > satisfied > about including a cert. I had assumed that your -1 is no longer in effect, > but I > don't see that said explicitly, could you clarify? Well... The cert looks good now, BTW. I still don't really like the idea of distributing a key + cert just for testing purposes. I can't quite explain why, but I can point to pretty much every other software package that does SSL not including them as a statement that it's not generally done. I also think that the test should not attempt to auto-enable and should be enabled in the same method as network and razor tests. There are times you'd want to compile in support, and run the main tests, but not run the SSL test(s). So I'm -0.5. I think some changes need to be made. However, if everyone else thinks it's a good idea, fine. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
