http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 15:10 ------- Subject: Re: [review]New regression test for SSL in spamc/spamd On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:39:32PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > As for having the make test generate a key and cert on the fly, that would > require access to the openssl executable. Since spamd requires IO::Socket::SSL I never said it should do that. > In any case, I would like to see what I have ready now in 3.0 so we find out > about any platform specific problems with spamc/spamd SSL sooner rather than > later. That's the point of a regression test. BTW: the patch should also have a MANIFEST update for the new files. Anyway, I understand the discussions that have occured in this ticket, and my general thoughts on the subject have already been posted. The veto was revoked, and the voting description page describes my -0.5 very accurately: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational justification for my feelings.' So right now as far as patch application, there's 2 +1's from Sidney and Justin. Anyone else care to chime in? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
