On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 11:28:02AM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote: > Sorry, it seemed trivial and non-controversial because it's a new API in > 3.0, avoids confusion, lock-in after 3.0 final, and, well, misspelling a > function name would be embarrassing.
All good reasons, but it's still an API change and needs to be voted
on before inclusion. IMO, API changes at this stage of 3.0.0 are
non-trivial.
Note: I'm not against the idea of making the change, I'm against this
being considered "trivial" and committed without comment by the rest of
the dev team.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"No one cares if you backup - only if you can restore."
- W. Curtis Preston, Unix Backup & Recovery from O'Reilly
pgpW35LIs9G6a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
