-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes: > Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > FYI: I reverted the change. r22977. > > I would have reverted the change if asked and I was anticipating a vote > rather than being reverted. I don't think we need to revert changes on > procedural grounds. Procedurally, Theo's correct to do that -- it *is* R-T-C, and it should not be committed, even if there's a vote in progress on that change. But voting-wise: +1 on the change. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFA+C9hQTcbUG5Y7woRAqk7AKDFTtruzVmI2n2r4NMf6LdEUhT6vQCfdG6n WCVQCV71Mar2t242aLKhgvM= =6tPP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
