http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3615
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-19 11:37 ------- Subject: Re: SPF_(PASS|FAIL|SOFTFAIL) rule doesn't hit when it should -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >However, I can live with the fact that I need to patch out one line of code in >SPF.pm if there is no parameter to indicate that the trusted relays don't >mess with the envelope sender. If I'm the only one who would like to see the >SPF code work despite having some trusted relays, that's the price I have to >pay. Feel free to post a patch that adds a new config parameter that does this; something like trust_env_sender_networks [ IP_addr_or_CIDR_mask ... ] in other words, the same semantics as trusted_networks/internal_networks, but to indicate nets that can be trusted to preserve the envelope sender data. I'd be in favour of including this, and I think the other devs might too. (comments guys?) IMO, most hosts will not do this in most deployment scenarios. But I can foresee infrequent special-case situations where this might work. Also IMO -- changing the MTA config to record the env-sender data in the Received headers seems like the easiest fix. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFA/BS6QTcbUG5Y7woRArROAKC6Ex/O9dwgs0rP3t36tMbuIW+nXgCgplw6 EOlYfO/c0YxGOwxKffFX2ks= =4GqN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
