http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3620
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-20 07:12 -------
FWIW, I just did some tests which confirm the problem part of the regex is
still:
[0-9.]+
Because that's matching the very line line of .'s - if you s/./0/ you have the
same problem, whilst if you s/./t/ you don't.
One of the suggestions seemed to including a explicit count rather than a +,
which might well be safer?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
