On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:38:58PM -0600, Michael Geier wrote: > Maybe some people are taking my recommendation a little to strongly. > > In answer to your points: > [1]If you belong to a list that does it, put them in your whitelist (in my > opinion, any list you belong to should be in a whitelist anyway). > > [2] I frankly don't understand the point of that one... > > [3] If people need control over where the replies are sent, is it impossible to > have the original message sent from the same domain? Whoever heard of a mail > server you could retrieve from, but couldn't send from, or at least that SMTP > and POP3/IMAP weren't in the same domain? > > Also, nobody is saying score it like CTYPE_JUST_HTML...maybe only add 0.1 or > 0.05, but I find it to be a little sad most spammers these days tend to send > from one address and reply-to another (neither of which is valid), and send off > some asian relay who's admin is stupid enough to use default installations of > outdated SMTP packages (ie. relay server). >
This is a BAD idea. We ALREADY HAVE a test that does similar things -- DIFFERENT_REPLY_TO. That test works. Your proposal doesn't. -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
