I'm not 100% on how the SA rules work so please excuse any stupid remarks
here...
I have read #46 to try and not repeat anything already said...
If lolita was part of the PORN3 rule then it would contribute to the
triggering of that rule and thus incur the score of the PORN3 on the message
being filtered.
My point about having a seperate rule was that I use alot of porny words
talking to my friends (fucking bitch cunt slapper shit piss arse etc) but no
one I know ever uses the word lolita. The last time I heard that word being
used not in relation to porn was when I had a friend called Lolita (Some 15
years ago now). As far as I can think of Lolita is only ever used as a porn
phrase unless it's someone's name. The idea of the PORN_3 rule (As far as I
can see) is to catch frequently used PORN close together as to avoid false
positives generated by potty mouths like myself, this is not a frequently
used word though..... Also the Lolita mails I get would not get caught by
the PORN_3 rule. The language is very neutral, talking about young boys and
eager girls. Nothing smutty (Unless you read between the lines).
So......
I think the Lolita is a dead give away that the mail is SPAM and should get
it's own rule. I think there are probbaly a few other words too but I can't
think of any.... maybe cheerleader? There are very few people exchanging
mail about real cheerleaders as far as I can tell. Maybe I'm just in the
wrong circles. If it was a rule on it's own or with similar words only
generaly used in spam with a hit to trigger setup, it could have a much
higher score with a lower chance of causing false positives..... I think....
Nick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:36 PM
> To: Nick Fisher
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Lolitas rule.....
>
>
> Maybe better would be to include "lolita" in the re-worked PORN3 rule.
> (bugzilla #46)
>
> C
>
> On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 08:10, Nick Fisher wrote:
> > I don't know about anyone else but the only time the word "Lolita(s)" is
> > used in my mail it's spam. I noticed this because some lolita
> spam has been
> > getting through SA with a score of 1 or 2. I say let's give
> lolita it's own
> > little high scoring rule.
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> >
> >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
