The idea of bugzilla #46 is to do something more sensible with the PORN rules. Particularly PORN3 which has all kinds of definitely-spammy and very-unspammy phrases mixed in. PORN3 might trigger innocently on words like "asian", "wild", "live", etc. The idea is to possibly do something like spam phrases where occurrence of words such as "lolita" or "teenfuck" would be much more highly indicative of spamminess, particularly so if there are many such words in close proximity in a message.
C On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 11:05, Nick Fisher wrote: > I'm not 100% on how the SA rules work so please excuse any stupid remarks > here... > I have read #46 to try and not repeat anything already said... > If lolita was part of the PORN3 rule then it would contribute to the > triggering of that rule and thus incur the score of the PORN3 on the message > being filtered. > My point about having a seperate rule was that I use alot of porny words > talking to my friends (fucking bitch cunt slapper shit piss arse etc) but no > one I know ever uses the word lolita. The last time I heard that word being > used not in relation to porn was when I had a friend called Lolita (Some 15 > years ago now). As far as I can think of Lolita is only ever used as a porn > phrase unless it's someone's name. The idea of the PORN_3 rule (As far as I > can see) is to catch frequently used PORN close together as to avoid false > positives generated by potty mouths like myself, this is not a frequently > used word though..... Also the Lolita mails I get would not get caught by > the PORN_3 rule. The language is very neutral, talking about young boys and > eager girls. Nothing smutty (Unless you read between the lines). > > So...... > I think the Lolita is a dead give away that the mail is SPAM and should get > it's own rule. I think there are probbaly a few other words too but I can't > think of any.... maybe cheerleader? There are very few people exchanging > mail about real cheerleaders as far as I can tell. Maybe I'm just in the > wrong circles. If it was a rule on it's own or with similar words only > generaly used in spam with a hit to trigger setup, it could have a much > higher score with a lower chance of causing false positives..... I think.... > > Nick > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:36 PM > > To: Nick Fisher > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Lolitas rule..... > > > > > > Maybe better would be to include "lolita" in the re-worked PORN3 rule. > > (bugzilla #46) > > > > C > > > > On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 08:10, Nick Fisher wrote: > > > I don't know about anyone else but the only time the word "Lolita(s)" is > > > used in my mail it's spam. I noticed this because some lolita > > spam has been > > > getting through SA with a score of 1 or 2. I say let's give > > lolita it's own > > > little high scoring rule. > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
