On Wed, 1 May 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote: > So about all you could say from just this analysis is that rules that were > never hit could possibly be deleted.
In addition, any rules analysis is incomplete without the frequency of rule hits in non-spam mail. After all, just beacuse there's a Received header in 100% of spam doesn't mean it's a good rule to filter spam on. -- Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams http://pgp.mit.edu/ | =----------------------------------+------------------------------- All syllogisms contain three lines | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Therefore this is not a syllogism | www.gslis.utexas.edu/~shanew _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
