On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 19:31, Neulinger, Nathan wrote: > The biggest problem with -S is due to the ordering of the rule checks. > If all of the negative rules (or at least the _large_ negative rules) > were processed first, it would probably be ok
All the large negative rules *are* processed first, albeit still split into "header", "body", "full body", and "other" rules first. I think Craig's latest update to change all the rules to unique subs (which was for running profiling on spamassassin) might actually turn out to work really well for this sort of thing, as we could completely run the rules in the right order. The only problem is things like AWL that don't have a static score. Those sort of things should probably be run first, but don't seem to be. And I can't remember why they aren't right now. Matt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
