Well, AWL can't really run first. It more or less *has* to run last. But
there's no reason it can't run last, after the early-terminate has terminated:
while(early-terminate condition not met)
{
step through some rules
}
check awl here
as opposed to treating AWL as just another rule.
C
Matt Sergeant wrote:
MS> On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 19:31, Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
MS> > The biggest problem with -S is due to the ordering of the rule checks.
MS> > If all of the negative rules (or at least the _large_ negative rules)
MS> > were processed first, it would probably be ok
MS>
MS> All the large negative rules *are* processed first, albeit still split
MS> into "header", "body", "full body", and "other" rules first.
MS>
MS> I think Craig's latest update to change all the rules to unique subs
MS> (which was for running profiling on spamassassin) might actually turn
MS> out to work really well for this sort of thing, as we could completely
MS> run the rules in the right order.
MS>
MS> The only problem is things like AWL that don't have a static score.
MS> Those sort of things should probably be run first, but don't seem to be.
MS> And I can't remember why they aren't right now.
_______________________________________________________________
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
