I missed the original question...I'm assuming that someone wants to integrate SA into postfix without using procmail?
My answer would be to try the /etc/postfix/master.cf file. In that file, you have options to pipe smtp sent mail through various options...in fact, it is through this file that i have set up amavis for virus scanning. I would imagine that piping through SA could be done similarly. On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, SpamTalk wrote: > I would sack postfix before SA. Was any attempt made to query a postfix > mailing list? > Since postfix is installed, I assume that sendmail is not a viable > alternative (to be honest I am waiting for the next release of amvis or > spamass-milter. Someone mention mime-defang milter also supports SA but I am > not sure what else it does, haven't had time to research it). > > Exim has support for SA and is supposed to install reasonably easy and there > is at least on person on this list that appears to be intimately familiar > with SA/Exim. > > When your looking for free, you have to be flexible. If you cant replace > postfix, front end it couple boxes dedicated to running > SA+Supported-MTA-of-your-choice. You don't say what your message volume is, > but Wal-mart > http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?product_id=1957333&cat=3951&type= > 19&dept=3944 > has a mid-tower > 800Mhz 128 MB memory > 10 GB hard drive > CD-ROM drive > Integrated 10/100 Ethernet connection > LindowsOS operating system > Modem and floppy disk drive are not included > > should handle a moderate volume. > > Redhat purports to support clustering, and when I get SA integrated into > production I am going to explore the next step of a load-balanced SA > cluster. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Duncan Findlay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (No Subject) is there a user-admin for SA with postfix > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 05:58:11PM -0500, dogface wrote: > > from what i have read on this list > > i would of expected nothing less than > > the response i got from you. > > I'm confused. This mailing list is generally quite informative. > > > A. after 3 posts maybe someone could have said > > that there are no options for what i am asking. > > After 2 posts, I would have assumed that what I am asking has not been done, > not that everyone on the mailing list is being particularly unhelpful. > However, you aren't the only one that's come to this conclusion recently. > Perhaps we need a FAQ or warning somewhere as > follows: > > Q. Why has my question not been answered? Should I ask again? > > A. We don't know the answer or you have not provided sufficient information. > [insert info on what to provide]. Unless you have more info to add, please > do not ask again for at least one week. If you still do not get a reply, > assume nobody knows the answer to your problem. If you manage to solve your > problem on your own, please mail the list and explain what your problem was > and how you fixed it so that people with your problem in the future will be > able to find an answer. > > > B. i already said that i read all i could find because > > i did not get any help from this list. i have been RTFM'ing for over a > > month. google is your friend. > > Great. > > > C. postfix rules. > > Don't start a flamewar, please. > > > D. i would be very willing to give more information if > > i would have gotten ANY kind of a response telling me to > > give specifics on whatever they needed to know to help me. > > Perhaps you should have just given this extra info (too much info is better > than not enough). > > > E. do a search on google about SA and postfix. you will see a LOT of > > questions from people, Very few if even that on answers. > > Well, then few people know how to use SA with postfix. I use SA with > procmail. Of course, I won't be able to help you. > > > F. there was no threat. i need to do whatever i can do to help my > > users out. if SA cant do the job, i have no choice but to find > > something that can. how is that a threat? that's like owning a FORD > > that cant make it all the way to work everyday, or find an OLDS that > > Will. where is the threat? i have an issue that need to be resolved. > > Agreed, there's no threat. Please don't say you have an issue that you need > to have resolved. We have no obligation to help you, demanding it is only > making us less likely to help. > > > G. from where i stand. a simple "no" or "cant be done" is Way better > > than nothing. > > A "no" or "can't be done" would be a lie. I'm not going to lie to you. I'm > sure what you propose can be done, given sufficient will and a little bit of > coding. So the answer is "Yes, it can be done, but I don't know if anyone's > done it." > > It certainly is impratical for everyone to respond in such a manner every > time someone posts to the list, not to mention it being a waste of bandwidth > and everyone's time. You really don't want 200 messages all saying "I'm sure > it could be done, but I don't know how" > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
