-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 the voices made Steve Thomas write: > > > | what about changing the tld to .invalid? > > > > Too easy for the spammers to spot. I'd rather they waste their time and > > resources and add pollution to their address lists than discard the address > > from the get-go. > > Do both... I don't want to register a never before used domain 3 years from > now just to discover that thanks to a lot of "creative" people out there it's > already on every spammers list.
But what if spammers do randomly add guessed domain names to their lists? Whatif someone sells guessed email addresses to spammers? My point is, if spammers do add wrong addresses to their dbs and don't even remove them if there's no MX they could spam to for years, then probably any possible address, i.e. anything matching /.*@.*/, will be on their lists very soon. Consequently they could use a simple loop, too. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.2 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQE9waHNY6Nk2Nv6ZRcRAu5eAJ9rVDqs8XmkDqJQu0zqqvvfnu4/KQCdFTTj GfXZ3GjCCaO1QZK4Sa/MHeQ= =g3Fj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
