--On Thursday, June 5, 2003 3:29 AM -0700 Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Alan Leghart wrote:
OK. So how about the unanswered post from earlier today?
--On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 11:07 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I send e-mail to some people using spamassassin it gets flagged > as spam with the Forged-MUA-Outlook flag (pasted below)
Are you telling me that this buffon has turned SpamAssassin into a MUA?
"When I send e-mail to some people using spamassassin" does not mean "when I, using spamassassin, send e-mail to some people".
Re-read again.
"When I send e-mail to some people [who are] using spamassassin [on their incoming mail, they write back to tell me] it gets flagged as spam ..."
And there is a known bug with FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK giving false positives, because of a new version number of Outlook if I recall correctly.
Ah, I see. Bad English.
Better said, "When I send e-mail to some people who use SpamAssassin...."
Common problem when we don't all speak the same language. My French and Dutch must sound hilarious coming from on-line translators. As written, that sentence means something completely different.
The FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK problem could be deduced by looking at the SA version. You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) are probably using a different version than the people who are receiving your messages with the FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK tag.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. One less point for the conspiracy theory.
--Alan
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
