> -----Original Message----- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:42:24AM -0700, Cassandra Lynette > Brockett wrote: > > Personally not really liking rhat very much, I'd suggest > another OS, but for > > stability, so far 6.2 is the most stable of the rhat > releases I've played > > 6.2 is ok if you don't mind the fact it's EOLed and you'd > want to majorly > upgrade stuff on there (perl is the main one for SA...) > > > with, though 7.3 is a good runner up. I'd give 9 a while > (read minor > > version or two) before trying it on anything but a test machine. > > I'm running 7.3 in a few places and it's nice and stable. I > would also > suggest avoiding 9 for now. >
I'm running a bunch of 6.2 servers here as well. Lots of things needed upgrades from source. I think 6.2 also had the syslog problem that you had to upgrade. (Been a while since I did that.) I've also heard 7.3 is great to run production on. I'm going to wait for 10.X (Where X !=0 ) before working on any new installs. Otherwise 7.3 for me! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
