On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Matt Beland wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40 pm, Ryan Bingham wrote: > > Didn't this (and all the subsequent flames) just happen? Like several > > times already in the recent past?? > > > > Anyone ever see Groundhog Day? I'm startin to get wigged out... > > Yeah, but these guys aren't as funny as Bill Murray. > > One other thing to note - virtually all of the people emailing the list and > complaining are sending email without subjects. Now, it's been a while since > I used Outlook or Little Outlook, but I seem to recall they both complain > when you try to do that. Not only that, but in my experience, even people who > aren't used to email quickly grasp the objective of the Subject line and use > it. So now we have a variety of people who all > > 1. Don't like SpamAssassin > > 2. Use Outlook or Little Outlook (not very distinguishing, granted) > > 3. Don't use subject lines > > 4. Did enough research to find the mailing list, but not enough (apparently) > to see what the list is for. > > Does anyone else think this is an odd series of coincidences? Or have I > watched too many conspiracy movies lately?
Whether or not you've watched too many conspiracy movies is not a call I'd care to make, but you are right about your theorey. The key is that tone of the letters is one of computer ignorance, yet they found this list, which takes some doing. Someone is pulling our chain and trying to clog this list with crud. -- Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
