[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > but now what i want to do is run a local copy of an rbl on a local > name server, to reduce network latency and increase reliability, > and given the operational unpleasantness of microsoft dns on NT, > i don't want to put it there.
In 2.60, RBL lookups are going to be a *lot* faster. I should do some benchmarks vs. 2.55, but you should notice a very nice improvement. > there doesn't seem to be a way to have sa resolve a specific rbl via a > specific name server. > > has anyone hacked up launch_dnsbl_query or rbl_lookup to do this > sort of thing? Ewwww. This is something that really should be solved in your machine configuration. I think you could just configure a local DNS server to forward requests to the appropriate places. By the way, my last company used Unix just fine for DHCP, etc. My sympathies. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, and open http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ source consulting (looking for new work) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
