Em Qui, 2003-07-24 ās 10:55, Larry Gilson escreveu: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Buzzard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > What really pissed me off the other day was that I got some > > spam which got a low bayes score (and hence -5) but a high razor > > score (and hence +2 or so) so I ended up getting it... > > Now that is an interesting dilema. Since I don't run Bayes I don't run into > that situation. Your situation is like asking SA to score your experience > and score someone else's experience. If they do not match then they can be > cancelled. >
Something I found interesting was using Razor + Pyzor + Dcc. Then I create meta rules that matchs: Razor + Pyzor Razor + Dcc Pyzor + Dcc Razor + Pyzor + Dcc (this will also, of course, match all three before). This will raise the score if the spam has being seen in more than one system. Also I found very common to Razor trigger into non-spam e-mail. > This may be a little risky but is it possible to create a rule that says if > Razor but not bayes then Razor and set bayes to 0? > Anyone have an idea on how to this? Probably with a meta like RAZOR_CHECK && (BAYES_90 || BAYES_80 || xxxxxxx) where xxx you add every possible BAYES match that you want. []'s Raul Dias > --Larry ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
