-----Original Message----- >From: Tony Hoyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Unfortunately that's not it... Your message for example shows >up as an IPM.Note, and when I copy it to the public spam folder >it remains an IPM.Note, except exchange deletes the >PR_INTERNET_CONTENT property while copying. > >The support issue seems to be talking out messages that are >delivered to public folders, not those that are subsequently >moved in outlook by dragging/dropping.
I'm just hoping it's related in some way, it's just the closest red herring that explains the differences in Exchange 2000 public folder behavior vs 5.5 which has problems. What if you email a mail-enabled public folder directly? Dragging and dropping messages maintains the IPM.Note properties, and for me wipes out the PR_INTERNET_CONTENT, but mail sent directly to the email address of the mail-enabled public folder shows up as IPM.Post and maintains PR_INTERNET_CONTENT. It's very strange. I think it might have something to do with IPM.Post and IPM.Note behavior, but I'm not sure. If you read the KB article it seems to describe our situation: "Because of this, if you have a message archiving system where the e-mail messages must be completely stored and not changed or converted, you may not be able to archive messages from the public folder." Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
