When I first saw the SA, I marveled, why SA cannot delete the mail. SA can't delete the message. The possibility of the message deletion depends on the MTA you are using. If you use procmail for local delivery, you can teach the procmail to delete the message, if you use other program, you must teach your program to delete. :( Why SA itself cannot delete??? It would be easy for programming, or not?
Maca On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] H?kon Nilsen (Exinet AS) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using spamassassin, and got access to an account that as A LOT of spam > which I'm testing SA on. The results are very good, as to SA identifying > spam mail. > > > I'm wondering about the following: > - When SA tags a mail (as most configs I've seen out there does) - does it > delete the mail after 'learning' about the spammers? > > - Will the user receive just as many mail, but 95% of the mails he receive > are spam mail - hence just tagged, and not removed? > > - Is it recommended that I set up SA to drop any mail that classifies as a > tagged mail? Instead of tagging, I could simply nuke the mails. > > > It's pretty usefull to tag the mail, but it's very useless if it persists. > The user needs to get rid of the mail. I hope you guys can help me out here. > > > Best regards, > Haakon Nilsen > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
